This discussion will go beyond the colloquialism “God made them Adam and Eve not Adam and
Steve”; nor will it include those passages which speak on how a husband should act towards his
wife and vice versa. This piece will be discussing the sexual aspects of man, woman and
marriage as it pertains to homo and hetero sexuality. I will start with listing the applicable
quotes to show abasic Scriptural explanation of God’s design for the sexes and marriage.
Gen 1:26“Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness;”
Gen 1:27“So God created man in His own image; in the image ofGod He created him; male and female He
created them. Then God blessed them, and God said to them “Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue
it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on
Gen 2:18And the Lord God said, “It is not good that man should be alone; I will make him a helper comparable
Gen 2:23-24“And Adam said: “This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; She shall be called Woman,
because she was taken out of Man. Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his
wife, and they shall become one flesh”
Gen 19: 4-5“Now before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, both old and young, all the
people from every quarter, surrounded the house. And they called to Lot and said to him, “Where are the men
who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may know them”. (To know them carnally is the agreed
interpretation of this passage.)
Leviticus has a great deal of “shall not‘s” regarding who and what can be mated with. This is a good indication
humanity has had a problem with its sexuality since, well since the Garden of Eden. Some passages teach to keep
it in the species; something which OBVIOUSLY should be understood but man apparently has a problem with that
concept as well. Other passages speak against various forms of incest, daughters, mother, aunts, other people’s
wives and daughters, cousins, sisters, “mothers and daughters” and so on. Sexual rules abound, showing the
levels of depravity man can readily sink to. However, the focus of this piece is concerning “Gay” marriage so will be
confined to those passages.
18:22“You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.”
20:13 “If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They
shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.”
HOME The Sin Paradox About Contact Links Blog
10/27/2019 - Gay Marriage
Mt 19:4“and He answered and said to them “Have you not read that He who made them at the beginning made
them male and female. And said for this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his
wife and the two shall become one flesh? So then they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore what God
has joined together, let not man separate”.
1 Cor 6:9-11“Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived.
Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous,
nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortionists will inherit the kingdom of God.”
Gal 5:17-21 “But the flesh lusts against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; and these are contrary to
one another, so that you do not do the things that you wish. But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under
the law. Now the works of the flesh are evident, which are: adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lewdness,
idolotry, sorcery, hatred, contentions, jealousies, outbursts of wrath, selfish ambitions, dissensions, heresies,
envy, murders, drunkenness, revelries, and the like; of which I tell you beforehand, just as I also told you in
time past, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.
What is the argument all about?
Much of the “Gay” argument for so called “equal” marital status has allegedly been in regard to specific “rights”.
These are supposed to include hereditary rights of property, visitation in a hospital of the sick friend or “partner”
as they like to call it, the ability to be included in a group insurance policy. These are not a real problem
There is also no need for someone to necessarily be married to have these kinds of secular rights. These could
and should be handled very easily by the local State Legislative branches. If two friends, or more for that matter
decide to live together sharing expenses and life, there is no reason for these not to be allowed in a form of
Contract Law, both in the secular world and Scripturally.
Marriage is merely a contract, an official agreement between a man and a woman for the purposes of raising a
family, propagation of the species, the continuance of life. This is not to downplay its significance. This is
demonstrating there is no logical reason for even the concept of “Marriage” to be brought into the discussion of
the contractual rights at the heart of the argument. But the idea of marriage has been brought into this, the reason
is “Sex” was added to the formula; an abnormal, unnatural sexual orientation.
To quote again regarding the percentages of homosexuals within the human community as being apparently
unsubstantiated and blatantly false according to Newsweek; the true number being greatly exaggerated.
“We used that figure [10%] when most gay people were entirely hidden to try to create an impression of our
numerousness,’ says Tom Stoddard, former member of the Lambda Legal Defense Fund, “The Homosexual
Numbers” Newsweek March 22, 1993, p37.
The Role of Sex and Sexuality
The rights of “gay” marriage have always been available. At any time these so called “rights” which are purely
secular can be included in a group agreement of a legal contract. After all that is what a marriage is, a contract
between the man and the woman. The difference is a person’s sexual desires and gratifications are now part of the
relationship. Seeing what is on the internet is striking, frightening and the best example of what happens when
sexual desires are allowed to go unbridled. People, both men and women, will do anything to themselves. It is
beyond words the depravity humanity is capable of.
Next there is the idea a gay couple can raise a family. The TRUTH of the matter is this can only be done by the
destruction of a normal family first. The destruction may be one of fate, where the parents are killed and there is
no one to care for the child, or with the artificial insemination of a woman by someone outside of the partnered
couple. In these and all other examples, a normal family of a mother, father and their offspring is perverted into
something merely to satisfy the desires of the adult. The child is no longer a continuation of the parents, but a
possession, a self pleasing trophy to accommodate the egos of the adults in question. A kind of self aggrandizing
10/27/2019 - Gay Marriage
p , p g p y g q gg g
so called “proof” the so called adults can raise a child as well. But the qualification then becomes; does the child or
children involved go on to form true normal relationships and families or continue in a abrogation of what
humanity needs to continue as a growing species?
This also is not “raising a family” in the same way a normal couple creates life and raises a family. The difference is
in the ability to create life. That is what “sex” was and still is for. It was never intended to be merely a set of
A normal family can make the family grow from within, creating new life. The homosexual family can only grow by
taking from outside itself. It is in a sense a form of human family socialism. Hypothetically a government could
force the removal of children from their real families and given over to gay families to be raised, in a form of
“fairness”, “equality” and “social justice”; homosexuality is already being taught in some early year grade schools
around the country. It is a frightening concept, which seeing the direction the world is going is not outside the
realm of possibilities. California has been forwarding pro-Gay programs for years. This would go against Genesis
1:27. Homosexual marriages produce no fruit; they can only take the “fruit” of a heterosexual marriage. Thus the
homosexual marriage would no longer be multiplying but dividing. Only through the death of a normal family can
a homosexual family grow.
The legalization of Gay Marriage argument in California revealed an interesting aspect to this discussion.
The Gay community had won in the courts the right to Civil Unions. All the rights of a married couple were to
given them. Only one thing was held back, the word “married”. They could not use the term “married”, as that
would be preserved and reserved to the union of a male and female according to its historic and true definition.
The relationship would be known as “Civil Unions”, denoting the separation of Church and State in the terms. But
this was not enough apparently, as the Gay community immediately protested, they wanted the word “married” as
well. Why? The rights of medical insurance coverage and similar secular aspects were the supposed goals of the
What would be their reason for holding out for the word “marriage”? The question then becomes, what is so
important about the word and its use? The word is simple and has a very simple meaning which has meant the
same thing for thousands of years; the union of a man and a woman for the purposes of creating and raising a
family, with hope and faith a perpetual lineage. Religiously it also represents “the mystical bond between Christ
and His Church”. So Scripturally speaking, the word “marriage” has a deeper meaning. What does this have to do
with their argument? Look again to the quotes from Leviticus and the Epistles. God states quite clearly and
categorically it is an “ABOMINATION” and as Paul writes, precludes going to heaven. God even had it punishable by
death in Ancient Israel. So what would this have to do with it?
The desire to have the word “marriage” applied to homosexual relationships is an attempt at a back door
approval by God and thereby the Church. It’s a misguided idea, the gay community knows from culture, history,
religion, law and their own actions in protests that the so called “gay lifestyle” is against the Bible, the revealed Will
of God and is an abominable sin. BUT, if the “state” or the “Federal Government” were to allow it, they could then
force the Church to recognize and approve, thereby supposedly removing the sin from the sinful action. It is truly
misguided as the Church or rather the Churches, which truly follow Scripture cannot abrogate a specific and clearly
stated edict by God. Those churches that do, have turned away and have corrupted themselves, they are best
considered the church of Thyratira.
Rev 2:20“Nevertheless I have a few things against you, because you allow that woman Jezebel, who calls herself
a prophetess, to teach and seduce My servants to commit sexual immorality and eat things sacrificed to idols”
This tactic by the gay community is similar to the demand by ancient Israel for a secular style king instead of God
as the Supreme authority. The concept being to have “man’s” secular “government” impose secular marital
parameters and recognition onto the Churches. Then they would be approved by the Church and able to continue
to commit their sin, having forced God’s approval. Since no one can force God’s approval, blessing or hand this is
as stated “misguided”.
The fostering and propagation of the “gay” lifestyle can be easily seen as a corrupting force in society.
Another way to describe “corruption” is to use it as the Bible does on occasion, as a metaphor for “disease” or
“infection”, decay. A disease works on the body the same way “corrupt” thoughts and acts work on the mind and
10/27/2019 - Gay Marriage
, y y y p g
spirit. They slowly eat away at that part of the individual, ever so slowly separating them further and further from
God and Christ. Is there any question the gay lifestyle spreads physical diseases? Three letters, H, I, V answers
The homosexual act is an act born of un-cleanliness in all three categories, body, mind and spirit. The
Bible does not mention specifically the existence of germs and micro-organisms, but the Biblical lifestyle,
especially the Kosher rules, are perfectly designed and suited for the containment of the spread of just those
organisms. Like a computer virus corrupts the thinking of our computers, the lies of Satan act like a disease on
our own minds and souls thus affecting our bodies. Sexuality is not immune to these corrupting tactics of Satan
and is one of the main roads into a person’s self destruction.
Gender roles in marriage
Physically a man would bring home the “raw materials” for food (the kill from the hunt, that which was gathered,
crops raised). The wife would then mold the raw materials into food for the body’s energy for the family.
Spiritually the man would, like a child raising his hands to be lifted up by his Dad, lift his hands to God in praise,
worship, faith, wonder and love; and from this interaction receive the spiritual powers from God and heaven.
With this the man takes on the role of the creating father and would transfer the energy into his wife. Then in the
image of God as the Holy Spirit, she would then mold the Spiritual energy into life, protecting, comforting and
nurturing the new life as he or she grew. The new life grows into the role it is destined to be. This is an aspect of
predestination. Your gender predetermines your role in life. How you live it is your “choice”. Trying to change it
either by actions or surgery goes against God’s Design and Will.
These are not insignificant roles to play either. The man becomes the image of God when he imparts the energy to
the woman. The woman is in the image of God when like an artist who receives inspiration and uses the paint and
canvas, mixes the spiritual with the physical to create art. This is the same as when God the Father energized the
universe which then molded the energy into what we call “Creation”. This is the lesson of the Trinity of God’s
Family plan. Homosexuality stops this in its tracks. As previously stated, a homosexual marriage does not create
life. Life ends with homosexuality; the future ends with homosexuality. God’s plan is about life, not death.
The Nature of Homosexuality
This is a restatement in short form of the previous chapter.
Some claim homosexuality is “natural” others claim it is a choice. For homosexuality to be “natural” we have to
understand the nature of sexuality. A member of each sex is attracted to one of the other to bring forth another of
the species, thus continuing live and ensuring the future. The concepts of “Natural Selection” come in to play here
as that sets up the parameters of how the genetics work to improve the species and prevent corrupting genetic
mutations from occurring and continuing. When “Nature” dictates a creature to have a predilection for one of its
own sex, it is to prevent it from mating, from breeding. It is by the tenants of the Science of Evolution not to
propagate, not to breed nor have offspring, descendents, and a future lineage. Why does the Natural Process do
this? As already pointed out, it is to prevent the continuation of diseases and future birth defects. It is the method
of Natural Selection. Natural Homosexuality using this model from the process of Natural Selection can then be
described as a birth defect in and of itself.
Natural vs. Choice
The other aspect of homosexuality is it being a conscious choice to live such a lifestyle, as opposed to a natural
instinct. If homosexuality instead becomes strictly a matter of “choice” it is then severed from it being “natural”;
thus making it an unnatural act. It becomes a conscious choice to commit a known sin for little more than
momentary pleasure. This is just as bad as any extra or premarital affair if not worse. In the case of personal
choice, the pleasure may not be in the sexual aspects of the action and may rest in the contradictory nature of
them. The homosexual practices may be a form of protest against the Church, society, parents, God. This does
not reduce its level of sinfulness, nor does it justify. Regardless of the individual’s personal motive or drive, the
Lord’s opinion on it does not change. He absolutely and completely knows what is in a person’s heart.
Homosexuality is inherently by its own nature a self centered, self gratifying action. The parts of the body
associated with sexuality are very specifically designed for human reproduction as well as physical pleasure. The
10/27/2019 - Gay Marriage
y y p y g p p y p
two genders, their anatomies respectively are designed for the connection to and pleasure of the other. The
physical pleasure is blatantly to entice the two into the very bizarre act of mating. Alternately, homosexuality is
only towards itself, its own form or gender, inherently self pleasing; therefore a homosexual act is in and of itself
nothing more than an act of masturbation by proxy.
There are definitely self serving motives behind the gay mindset.
Gays know the truth of sex and its purpose. They heard the Truth of Christ and the Bible’s teaching on the
subject. They have denied these Truth’s for the sake of their own desires. Similarly Iran (and others) denies the
Holocaust for the sake of their own anti-Semitic, anti-Christian agenda. Neo-Nazis deny the fact Jesus was the
King of the Jews when they (and everyone else for that matter) hate the Jews (and everyone else for that matter).
Palestinians deny the fact God promised the land to the Jews, despite the fact they know it from their own history.
Those and more all have one thing in common, their desires versus the Truth. A form of a founding pillar of
Biblical teachings, the tendency for man to put his will or desire(s) in place of God’s Will or Desire.
The story of Sodom at one time was fairly well known. Two strangers, Angels of God, appearing as two men visited
Lot, the nephew of Abraham living in the city of Sodom on the Dead Sea. The men (“both old and young”) of the
city wanted to know the two male travelers in a sexual way. So Lot offered his own virgin daughters in their place.
This is interesting in that Lot, instead of “offering himself” so to speak, offered his daughters. So if nothing else, at
least their sin would be minimized to “fornication” and / or “adultery”. Lot was saying “here have sex with these
girls if you must have sex at all” but not with the men. It is understood the motive was protection of the visitors,
the wandering stranger. But the offer of the two girls subtly shows the distancing from the male to male contact
Saint Paul had a “Cross” to bear of his own. Though what it was is never mentioned, he spoke of his struggle with
this perceived flaw to his character. I do not mean to imply this was homosexuality by any means, but
homosexuality can be compared to it in so much as it is a personal temptation away from God, which the individual
must struggle with continually. It may be a drug addiction, a bad attitude, or sexual desire inclusive of
homosexuality or any number of distractions from God. So, using Saint Paul as a model, a homosexual can achieve
his / her Divine Spiritual potential by controlling the desire for their particular “demon” just as St. Paul.
Homosexuality and homosexual marriages are themselves demonstrably anti-Biblical, therefore anti-Christ. The
physical practices go against God’s design for mankind and the best way for humans to come into this world and
grow. The homosexual union or marriage is contrary to everything the Bible teaches about marriage and the
proper partnership for “man”. Just as the Holy Spirit is the “parakletos”, to be by our side; woman was to be man’s
help mate, by his side, taken from Adam’s rib, his side. The homosexual relationship is contradictory to all of
these things and is thereby destructive to the “family” and the Trinity of the Family with the Father, the Mother and
the Child; the future of humanity and civilization. Once the family is corrupted, the rest of the society will follow.
In the end God’s Will must be adhered to for mankind to continue into the future. “Marriage” must only be how
God intended, between a male and a female, as between Christ and His Church. Amen